Mon, 3 November 2008 Tobias Fors and Magnus Ljadas interviewed me about a wide variety of topics. This podcast is part 2 of 2.The questions are:
Click here for the mp3 version of this podcast. Comments[1] |
Mon, 6 October 2008 Tobias Fors and Magnus Ljadas interviewed me about a wide variety of topics. This podcast is part 1 of 2.The questions are:
Here is the information page for PSL in Sweden. You don't have to be a Swede to join us! Click here for the mp3 version of this podcast. Comments[0] |
Fri, 22 August 2008 I'm Johanna Rothman, and this is the Pragmatic Manager podcast. In this podcast, we’ll take a look at how to talk about how many projects you are attempting to finish. I meet people all the time, and I'm always amazed when I meet developers, project managers, testers, writers, and other project staff who look as if they haven't slept in days. One project manager said, “I'm managing three projects. I'm not making any progress on any of them. But my boss thinks I should be able to manage at least three projects. How many should I be able to manage?” I wish I had the right answer. The best answer is “It depends.” Here’s why. If you have an extraordinary team who knows how to work together, who can resolve issues among themselves, who can remove obstacles by themselves, who can negotiate for resources if they need them, and who have enough discipline to monitor their work and steer the project without you, you can manage that project team--because they don't need you--and one other normal team. Same thing with developers. Same thing with testers. If you're multitasking and trying to work on multiple projects, you know you are shortchanging at least one of them, if not all of them. A successful project manager can manage one project at a time. Same with developers. Same with testers You can make yourself nuts by trying to work on more projects, but you're unlikely to be successful. And yes, I know several people who seem to be quite good at managing multiple projects. They all have extraordinary teams, not normal teams made up of normal human beings. So why do people have more than one project at a time to finish? Because their managers don’t know how or don’t realize how to manage the project portfolio. While you wait for me to finish the project portfolio book, here’s a six-step plan for what you can do:
Now you have a picture of a project portfolio, and you can talk to your boss about it. In another podcast, I’ll give you some hints on how to say No to work you can’t do. At least now, you have a picture of all the work you’re supposed to do. I'm offering a public project management workshop Sept. 22-24, 2008 in Waltham, MA. You’ll learn how to start, steer, and end a project successfully, using pragmatic approaches. You’ll have a chance to practice approaches to project management that prevent this business of trying to manage multiple projects or manage the people who are supposed to be working on multiple projects at the same time. Go to jrothman.com/workshops.html for more information. I’ll have the specific URL with the workshop description and registration in the show notes for this episode as well as a transcript of this episode. Some of my listeners have requested that I respond to questions or run these podcasts as an interview. Sounds like fun to me! If you want to interview me, contact me. Have comments on this podcast? I’d love to hear from you. Email me at jr@jrothman.com Click for the mp3 file. Comments[0] |
Tue, 15 July 2008 A project manager at a client took me aside recently. "Johanna, how many emergency projects should I have?" I was a bit surprised and asked what he meant. "Well, my boss thinks I can manage two normal projects and two or three emergency projects. I'm swamped."I would think so. If I'm managing one project--actively managing, not caretaking--I can't even take on one emergency project, never mind two or three. Asking a project manager to actively manage risks, remove obstacles, and help the team accomplish the work on several projects--a couple of which are the most important thing the company can do--is overloading the project manager. So, how do things get this way? One reason for emergency projects is from a previous project’s technical debt: work that was necessary for a product--but not completed--in a previous project. To be fair, when the world changes out from underneath you, you might have an emergency project to catch up, but those shouldn’t be the norm. Emergency projects have names such as "hot fix" or "patch release" or "service pack" or something else that acknowledges the work wasn't finished the first time—those are the one that have technical debt. But the debt can be anywhere. If you don't have a coherent and cohesive design, writing and testing the code feels as if you're strangling yourself, and the product doesn't quite work the way you and the customers expect it to. Without requirements in some agreed-upon form, developers and testers decide on their own what the features need to be. Sometimes they even agree--but the customers might not. If the project team ran out of time for a feature or two or three, features the customers expect but are missing, some High Manager will say, "Ok, we'll do a patch release." If the testers don't have enough time to test and the developers don't have enough time to fix defects, the number of total defects may overwhelm the customers, which will require a hot fix. If you have an emergency project, convince your manager that you need to pay attention to that project to the exclusion of every other project. If you don't, it's likely you and the team will not pay down enough technical debt, or that you won't know when you're done, or that you won't be able to meet the desired release date. Once you've got an emergency project, finish it. Now that you're past the emergency, can you see ways to organize, manage, or replan your current projects so you don't require more emergency projects? If you're not sure how, here are some ideas: - Timebox work on every single project. A timebox helps people focus on the work they need to complete *now*. - Work feature-by-feature instead of across the architecture, so everyone can see how good the features are and if the team will finish all the features by the desired date. - Integrate testing into every part of your project, instead of waiting for everything to be done before you start testing. If you work feature-by-feature, you can test feature-by-feature, which helps developers see how good their work is. Emergency projects slow everything down and prevent project managers and teams from making real progress on their work. Prevent them when you can. Finish them if you've got them. I'm offering a public project management workshop Sept. 22-24, 2008 in Waltham, MA. You’ll learn how to start, steer, and end a project successfully, using pragmatic approaches to project management. You’ll have a chance to practice approaches to projects that prevent emergency projects. Go to jrothman.com/workshops.html for more information. Here's the specific URL for the Manage It! Pragmatic Project Management Workshop. The registration form is on that page. Have comments on this podcast? I’d love to hear from you. Email me at jr@jrothman.com You can also listen to this podcast as an mp3. Comments[1] |
Mon, 23 June 2008 To read a transcript of this episode, go to Timeboxes Help Multisite Teams. To see the description of the workshop, go to Manage It! Pragmatic Project Management. Due to popular (at least one!) demand, I'm also attaching an mp3 file to this post. Comments[5] |

